This is a list of calculators from the late 1960s and 1970s which used Reverse Polish Notation (RPN) for their calculation. For those unaware of the difference, the standard for 99% of electronic calculators other than Hewlett
Packard was termed algebraic (arithetic?) notation. To add two numbers for instance, you would key in:
"12" "+" "3" and then hit the "=" key for the answer of "15"
In a RPN machine, you would key in:
"12" "enter" "3" "+" and the answer of "15" would appear on the display.
We invite you to contact us at email@example.com with the manufacturer and model # of any non-HP calculator in your collection that uses RPN. A clue would be an "enter" key on the keypad instead of a "=". Please also let us know the method of power (battery, rechargeable batteries, or AC/line voltage only.)
(We omit HPs only because we know virtually all of their models used RPN. Only in the last few years have they added a non-RPN machine to the lineup.)
By the way, here's a question for you brought up by one of our contributors:
"One complication with classifying rpn/non-rpn is where the old "arithmetic" style fits-- the ones with "+/=" and
"-/=" keys. I believe they function identically to the rpn style, except they have no enter key and only what we would call a two-level "stack". For example the Nat'l Inst. 400 (I believe?) is a simple
four-function LED calc that functions this way. They can just be ignored, but maybe there is a calc out there that fits somewhere between these classifications?"
Any comments or help from our readers????
Note: Here's a response to the question above from David Hicks, web-meister of the HP Museum --
"I call such machines "adding machine logic" machines. The HP-10 was HP's only adding machine logic
calculator. This style predates RPN by several hundred years and it's really stretching to call the two number registers a "two-level stack" because these machines supply no stack operations whatsoever.
machine logic machines switch to infix notation when multiplying and dividing whereas RPN machines remain postfix. The size of the stack doesn't make a machine RPN or not. HP's first RPN models had 3 level stacks.
By the way, this "old" style is still in production on many business-oriented printing models. It's fine for sums of products - like most business forms."
Dave Hicks (firstname.lastname@example.org)
of HP Calculators, http://www.teleport.com/~dgh/hpmuseum.html
RPN Calcs -- Version 2 (the version on this page will be changed as new information becomes available -- but we will not date it)
Thanks to Robert Bennett, Frank Boehm, Thomas Brockmeier, Rolf Brueckmann, Don Davis, Larry Gilbert, Kenton Green, Dave Hicks, Dave May, Joe Rigdon, Ken Sumrall, and Erik Peter van Dam for their inputs to date.
Disposable or Rechargeable Battery Powered Models
APF: Mark 55
Commodore (USA): MM6X (just the "X" version, not all)
Corvus (USA): 500
Elektronika (Russia): b3-19, b3-21, b3-34, mk-54, mk-61
Montgomery Ward (USA): P10
National Semiconductor (USA): 600, 900, Mathematician, 4615, 4640
(later name for National Semiconductor brand): 650, 3500 Sliderule, 4510 Mathematician, 4515 Mathematician PR, 4520 Scientist, 4525 Scientist PR, 6035 Statistician PR.
Omron (Japan): SR12
Privileg: Beginner, SR-54NC
Santron (Japan or Taiwan): 12S, 604
Sinclair (England): Scientific, Scientific Programmable
Super Cal(??): 616
AC / Line Powered Models
Anita (Sumlock Comptometer of England): 1011 LSI
Bell Anita: 1011
Friden: EC130, EC132, 1151, 1152, 1160, 1166.
Monroe: EPIC 3000
Copyright 1997 by Guy Ball